Groovy’s .with() and multiple assignment

Multiple assignment

I recently discovered a relatively little-known feature in Groovy called multiple assignment.  As the name indicates, it allows you to assign multiple values to multiple variables in one statement:

The Groovy docs do a good job of explaining the basics, however I did notice one limitation:

“[C]urrently only simple variables may be the target of multiple assignment expressions, e.g. if you have a person class with firstname and lastname fields, you can’t currently do this:

The key words here are “one simple variable.”  If only there were a Groovy construct that let us do this…

.with()

This is where the .with() method comes in.  It allows you to use methods/properties within a closure without having to repeat the object name each time. It does this by setting that object as the delegate of the closure, so any otherwise “undeclared” variables or methods get invoked on that object.  So if we have something like a Dog class and a Color enum:

we would normally set each property individually with:

And by using .with() we could simplify it to:

However, if we were to try multiple assignment here, it wouldn’t work because of the limitation above:

See how .with() can come in handy with multiple assignment?  The entire block could then be reduced to:

Of course, I’d recommend using this feature sparingly, as your code may be a little harder to read, but it is a potential workaround for assigning multiple values to properties!

Igor Shults

About the Author

Object Partners profile.

One thought on “Groovy’s .with() and multiple assignment

  1. Chris Malan says:

    This is neat. I use Groovy in Grails. Don’t think this isn’t appreciated.

    1. More appropriate here is probably Groovy’s map constructor:

      class Person {
      String firstname
      String lastname

      String toString() {
      “$firstname $lastname”
      }
      }

      Person me = [firstname: “Chris”, lastname: “Springer”]
      println me

      For larger objects with many properties, the builder pattern may be even more appropriate. Simple implementations can use @Builder annotation as of Groovy 2.3 to create a basic implementation with any code.

  2. Igor Shults says:

    @Christopher — Yeah the example here was pretty simplified. If you’re literally setting properties immediately after (or while) initializing an object, then this isn’t the best approach. But if you say, are performing an update on multiple properties of an object, then it could be more useful.

  3. Chuck Johnstone says:

    It’s a good solution when you want to assign from an array:

    def csv = ‘first,last,age’

    person.with {
    (first,last,age) = csv.split(‘,’)
    }

    Is a very useful technique.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Blog Posts
Interpreting Spatial Data in the Age of COVID-19
As 2020 has come to an end, many are eager to leave the mess of COVID-19 behind with the new year and gain a fresh start. Unfortunately, new cases are still soaring across the United […]
Building a Better Mousetrap
Recently, my daughter (age 6) was into building “mousetraps” out of shoe boxes. These were more or less comfortable cardboard mouse houses complete with beds, rooms, everything a mouse could want or need and not […]
ARM Wrestling Its Way Into Mainstream Software Development
Nearly all smart phones have been running ARM-based processors for years. They provide superior power for the amount of power consumed, and thus extend battery life. With Apple’s recent release of the Apple Silicon M1 […]
Video capture using WebRTC
Capturing the feed of a users camera can be a daunting undertaking involving one or multiple third party packages. Often we opt for prompting the user to upload the video or image we need, causing […]