Jan 25, 2013

Profiling Grails Applications With VisualVM

Lately, I have been finding the need to get into the bowels of Grails in order to increase the performance of large batch type features of any application. Most of the time the issue appears to be with the Hibernate session becoming over-saturated with references. Performance degrades significantly even when limiting the batch size to ~100 records. Luckily, Oracle ships a pretty decent profiler with Java, VisualVM. The trick is getting it to work correctly with a Grails application.

Here are the tricks, I’ve found

  1. Add the command ‘-Xverify:none’ to your GRAILS_OPTS environment variable before launching your application. VisualVM relies on class replacement to instrument your code for profiling, and this switch allows that to work correctly.
  2. Disable the auto reloading agent in Grails by passing -Dauto.recompile.disable=true on the command line when you start your Grails application. This mostly a safety measure. Since VisualVM is replacing classes, you don’t want Grails replacing over the top of them. Also, there is a significant performance hit when using the Reloading Agent once it recompiles any class since it it basically proxying every class reference.
  3. Launch VisualVM with a bunch of memory. Since Grails needs a good chunk of memory, the profiler is going to need a lot. You can increase memory to VisualVM by passing the commands -J-Xms<memory size> and -J-Xmx<memory size> on the command line when launching VisualVM (i.e. jvisualvm -J-Xms1G -J-Xmx1G).
  4. While your there, you should add your Grails application classes to VisualVM’s classpath so you can make better sense of the profiling results. You can prepend/append classes to VisualVM’s classpath by using the –cp:p and –cp:a arguments, respectively (i.e. jvisualvm -J-Xms1G -J-Xmx1G –cp:a <path to grails app>/target/classes

About the Author

Object Partners profile.

One thought on “Profiling Grails Applications With VisualVM

  1. The correct is: -Ddisable.auto.recompile=true

  2. Robert says:

    Would be great if you provide a best practice pattern for “Do not profile class” settings in the Profiler, as it takes ages with the default settings to instrument all classes before you can start testing. E.g. org.springsource.loaded.* is one candidate to narrow the scope. Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Blog Posts
Modern Development Environment for C++: Part 2
In Part 1 of this series, I gave a quick overview of each tool in the development environment and how I came to the conclusion that the tool was a good fit. Today I’m going […]
Mock Intl and Date globals in Jest
In Javascript land, mocking the browser global objects can be a bit of a pain for tests. Searching StackOverflow gives plenty of complicated answers. Some suggesting using 3rd party mock libraries. Some that overwrite the […]
Bitbucket Parameterized Pipelines
Introduction I’d like to address how to handle lots of deployment environments withinBitBucket Pipelines. Below I’m presenting two options: Using tags to parameterize builds Using the BitBucket API to pass variables Lots of Environments There […]
AWS Cloud HSM, Docker and NGINX
There is quite a bit of easily searchable content on the security benefits of leveraging a Hardware Security Module to manage cryptographic keys, so I will leave that to the scope of another article. The […]